Philosophy 103 Logic

Webmaster: TJHombre
[ New Account ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Threaded Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Bill_Clinton on October 18, 2000 at 02:30:22:

In Reply to: Please explain what is a FLAME? posted by Jimbo on October 17, 2000 at 23:50:43:

I read the following sentence a number of times and it didn't seem to make complete sense to me.

"If you can't see the King Bullshitter at work here and Im not that person then something is really wrong."

So I thought back to my Philosophy 103 Logic class and tried applying rules of logic. Anyone that knows logic well, please correct me if I applied rules incorrectly, it was MANY years ago.

The statement is basically composed of three separate conditions:
A. You can't see the King Bullshitter at work here
B. I'm not that person
C. Something is really wrong

From the wording of the sentence, I take this to mean that if condition A is true, AND condition B is true, then condition C is true.

What complicates understanding of the statement is that the three conditions are negative to begin with. However, my understanding is that if we negate all three conditions (thus making them positive) we still come out with a true statement.

By applying this logic, Jimbo could make the following statement and it would be true.
"If you can see the King Bullshitter at work here and I'm that person then something is really right."

Did I analyze that correctly?

Your friend Bill

Gore/Lieberman 2000!

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
Password:
E-Mail:
Subject:

Comments:

E-mail me when this message is replied to


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Threaded Board ] [ FAQ ]