Posted by Curious on March 27, 2001 at 14:43:29:
In Reply to: Re: The implications.... posted by sampson on March 27, 2001 at 12:23:54:
|
"that said i know that mexican men are getting money garnished for children that are in mexico." If the man is a Mexican Citizen working in the United States I suspect it is much easier to garnish his wages. This thread started with you mentioning yourself, and I guess I assumed you were a U.S. Citizen, so that is what I was talking about. "i don't know if any of these are putas and i wouldn't guess it matters." Only if the father is a U.S. Citizen, not a Mexican Citizen. "all children need support." I totally agree. And I believe that all men who father children should support those children. "i also know that it isn't to tough for a registered puta to get a visa--if she qualifies." If she is honest, and if she is registered under the same name she uses to apply for the VISA in a locality where she is a registered puta, she will be denied a VISA. Ask some of your friends if they told the authorities that they were putas when they applied for their VISA. "this is my second long term relationship with an illegal alien" Well, I was (and am) talking about LEGAL immigration. If her knowledge is that great, WHY is she here illegally? Just
|
|
|