By Kmanrox420 on Thursday, January 27, 2005 - 03:24 pm: Edit |
I'm looking for contact information on porn talent agencies in Rio. I realize any working girl will probably do it, but I will need some Brazilian male performers to perform with the girls and would like to hire a pro. Any help or tips please post of p/m me. thanks
By Hunterman on Friday, January 28, 2005 - 08:42 am: Edit |
DonGringo is a porn star--and he knows others.
By SportoLingo on Friday, January 28, 2005 - 01:17 pm: Edit |
DonGringo is a porn actor, now Ron Jeremy is a Porn Star. Although their body types are very similar and both are pretty humerous; one is merely an actor and the other is a bonifide star.
By Hunterman on Saturday, January 29, 2005 - 10:14 pm: Edit |
I don't like watching RJ, and he's become a fat disgusting old fart (but didn't know when to get out from in front of the camera). DeeG was actually pretty effective as an actor, plus I think I could relate more to what he calls his "chipmunk-sized equipment" than to RJ's sausage (in terms of fantasizing myself in his place).
What makes RJ a star in your eyes? Number of films? Check DeeG's private library.
By Laguy on Sunday, January 30, 2005 - 04:56 am: Edit |
Hunterman: One side of me wants to more about what you mean by your "relating" to DeeG's "chipmunk-sized equipment," but the other side of me is thoroughly disgusted.
By Laguy on Sunday, January 30, 2005 - 06:49 am: Edit |
"wants to KNOW more." Damn, I never have gotten this cutting and pasting thing down, an obvious necessity with long messages such as the one above.
For the record it should also be noted that RJ has been a fat disgusting old fart (to say the least) for at least a decade, probably two. The man needs to go low carb.
(Message edited by LAguy on January 30, 2005)
By SportoLingo on Sunday, January 30, 2005 - 12:23 pm: Edit |
Hunterman,
Now I never said that I liked to watch RJ, although I can relate to the disgusting old fart part. I was poking a little fun at Deeg, whom I do consider a friend. I did acknowledge him as an actor; but a Star has selling power and certainly RJ has sold a shit load of material, as compared to Deeg at this point. As far as the "equipment" issue; thankfully in the numerous occassions I have hung out with him, I have never seen him hanging out. Now that you have informed me that might happen upon viewing his videos on this site, I have let my multimedia acess lapse. Perhaps, I should have used Peter North as my example of a Star. All of this is just in fun.
SL
By Dongringo on Sunday, January 30, 2005 - 12:50 pm: Edit |
I've strayed from my diet lately, and am looking more and more like ol' RJ every day. Regrettably that's where the comparison ends. It seems no matter how many of those 'male enhancement' pills I take, I will always come up short of "The Hedgehog" himself. Heavy sigh....
Now Hunterman's film debut should provide some rather interesting footage. Although I never did get your proof of age ID. Hopefully noone will confuse you for an underaged actor.
And SportoL, you can relax - my unit will never be seen on THIS site. And with my package, I'm not harboring any hopes of becoming infamous. So far my nearest claim to fame is that I sat next to "Larry the Cable Guy" in the 10th grade. He was funny enough, but 'ahead of his time'. I'm glad to see him 'come of age' with Foxworthy et al...
By Catocony on Sunday, January 30, 2005 - 01:22 pm: Edit |
What I like about Ron Jeremy's screen library is his occasional appearance in non-porn movies: The Rules of Attraction, Reindeer Games, Detroit Rock City, 54, that funny as shit porn spoof from Trey Parker and Matt Stone called "Orgasmo", George Wallace and a few others. Always funny when you're watching a regular movie and The HedgeHog pops up in a scene, usually as a waiter or something along those lines.
His commentary in some of his porn vids are pretty funny as well. "Ok, I'm going to stick my dick in your ass now" "don't be alarmed, it's just my dick going in your pussy", it's just funny to watch.
By Hunterman on Tuesday, February 01, 2005 - 12:20 am: Edit |
OK, so Laguy never watches porn and fantasizes (I guess those clips you've been convincing your lovelies to allow you to take are for art's sake?), so that would explain the part which wants to know more (or maybe the other part....).
And DeeG does have selling power, look at how many garotas he's sold on letting him film them. But I think his library is private at this time, although if you pay him enough, he'd do a "24 Hours" special on HBO. Hopefully it would be all DeeG, none of these two rank amateurs he once conned onto film. And Hombre would never allow such trash on our site.
OK, Peter North is a star, I did consider buying a "Peter North's Greatest" somethings, but I passed when I saw that RJ was on the DVD too. He just doesn't motivate me to do anything but fast-forward. (Yes, I know, more than you need to know).
By Laguy on Tuesday, February 01, 2005 - 06:18 am: Edit |
Indeed, I just created another art masterpiece yesterday. But whereas I almost perfected Sterling's trademarked around, back and under photographic technique, I am still trying to develop expertise with the newly aquired mini-camcorder. One problem that I haven't been able to overcum (and believe me, it is better to overcum than undercum) is the video during some of the most intense scenes seems to bounce around a bit in a rather pulsating hypnotic rhythm. Any ideas on how to avoid this problem without the use of an unwieldy tripod?
By Dongringo on Tuesday, February 01, 2005 - 07:28 am: Edit |
Laguy
Practise galloping on an Arabian Stallion with a glass of '87 Merlot in one hand. When you can do so without looking like SweetMequite in a boite, you're ready for that camera angle.
Saddle up if you must, but riding bareback teaches better muscle control.
By Laguy on Tuesday, February 01, 2005 - 09:14 am: Edit |
DeeG: For a man with allegedly chipmunk-sized equipment your suggestion sounds a bit monkey-assed. Merlot?? Pleeeezz. What's wrong with using Cabernet?
By Dongringo on Tuesday, February 01, 2005 - 09:33 am: Edit |
LAG
"What's wrong with using Cabernet? "
For once in your life, think with the bigger head. Everyone knows that Merlot goes better with Arabian cuisine.
Also, try propping the camera on a pillow behind the action for this shot. FYI - Feather pillows absorb the motion of the bed better than do foam.
But be careful - the real challenge is to exclude any of your pinkeye from the film. Only a small percentage of the male populace might have an interest in seeing that. (I won't mention any names, but do the initials SFH ring a bell?)
By Whoretester on Tuesday, February 01, 2005 - 06:01 pm: Edit |
>>Any ideas on how to avoid this problem without the use of an unwieldy tripod? >>
Use a camera with built-in jiggle correction. This will reduce your resolution but stabilize your image a little.
By Dongringo on Tuesday, February 01, 2005 - 08:33 pm: Edit |
"Use a camera with built-in jiggle correction"
The tech term for this feature is Electronic Image Stabilization, or EIS. This feature works very well to smooth out the little rough edges, however, it will not compensate for the "around, back and under" camera angle while the cameraman/actor is piledriving the subject doggiestyle.
To pull this off and get marketable footage, Sterling must be more coordinated than he looks.
By Laguy on Tuesday, February 01, 2005 - 08:38 pm: Edit |
I sense alot of confusion in this thread. My reference to Sterling's around, back and under technique was simply a statement about one of the last challenges I met during my days as a mere photographer. Now that I am plunging into the world of camcordery, I have identified a problem with the video bouncing around in a pulsating hynotic rhythm, a finding that has nothing to do with the around, back and under photographic technique, notwithstanding some of the responses to my initial plea for help.
With the camcorder, I am admittedly starting with the most basic, the simple right hand held high with the garota being pumped below shot. With this shot, a measure of jiggle is actually a good thing, but I'm not so sure the other aforementioned artifacts are.
Unfortunately, because I am using a wide-angle conversion lens to widen the field of view, the built in jiggle-correction (aka Sony steady shot) is not an option, nor do I believe it is designed to correct for movement of the magnitude I am having to cope with.
I hope I have cleared up the confusion.
(Message edited by LAguy on February 01, 2005)
By Laguy on Tuesday, February 01, 2005 - 09:05 pm: Edit |
For any of you who saw the pre-edited version of the message above, I included a word that I thought meant something different than what it does. After consulting a dictionary, I edited the post to take out the inappropriate word. Sorry about that.
By Whoretester on Wednesday, February 02, 2005 - 06:58 pm: Edit |
Of course, if one of your hands is trying to think about keeping the camera steady, and the other hand is manning the hip for piledriving, good luck with any stability. My advise is to set the camera down in different spots (pre-determined) and pointed at the two of you, to catch lots of angles. If you want JUST that close-up of penetration, I have no suggestions.
When I am deep in my duty, the last thing I want to do is divide my attention with camera duty.
By Kmanrox420 on Wednesday, February 02, 2005 - 08:28 pm: Edit |
industry advice would dictate hiring an actual camera-person so there is no bounce and all the angles are utilized
By Dongringo on Wednesday, February 02, 2005 - 08:38 pm: Edit |
Kman
Hiring a cameraman sounds simple, but it really changes the dynamic of your time w/the girl. Some of the smoking best footage I've ever shot involved only me, her and the lense.
When you add a third person to the room, it is often more challenging to get her (and me for that matter) to relax and give it 100%.
The POV shoot (point of view) often offers the most stimulating perspective available.
By Brazil_Specialist on Thursday, February 03, 2005 - 02:08 am: Edit |
I know a few girls who have done porn shoots, I know a few contacts who can get more girls.
I have a photo studio and photo equipment. Would like to assist in filming. For a photo expert video is not a hard task, but I would need some advice in order to do effective filming.
There are pro film guys for hire, with full equipment and everything, probably starting at 200 R$ and up
By Gr8ter on Thursday, February 03, 2005 - 10:05 pm: Edit |
i just saw this website brazilbang and recognize many of the girls on there from monte carlo, including one i spent quite a few days with. i am not going to pay for the site so just saw the previews but it is always interesting to see girls i know on these sites. i wonder if they know/care that these things are on the internet. probably not but the thing that is weird is that i understand that they typically make only 700-1500 reais to do it.
By H2001c on Monday, February 14, 2005 - 10:55 pm: Edit |
Do any of you have a password to this site that you wouldn't mind sharing? I actually had lots of fun with the girl that introduces herself as Gabriela in one of the preview videos. We partied both in and out of Montecarlo and seeing her in action would bring back lots of good memories;)
By Kmanrox420 on Tuesday, February 15, 2005 - 08:49 am: Edit |
gr8ter, i think they get paid even less than that
By Kmanrox420 on Tuesday, February 22, 2005 - 08:23 am: Edit |
Scouts Wanted: I'm looking for 8-16 female talent/models that fit the following criteria:
1. Above average pretty faces with great bodies
2. Willing to do double penetration, and things of that magnitude
3. Have not been featured on a heavily marketed website like MikeinBrazil, or BrazilBang.
4. Aged 18-22 with 2 forms of I.D.
If you've got a girl you can refer to me for a series of shoots (ie. she'd get a minimum of 3 scenes/shoots and be paid *well* for each, plus other incentives), drop me a private message, and if I use her I will pay for 1 Karla's Model of your choice to come to you and fuck your brains out in return, or a cash equivelant if you prefer. Send me a knock-out-sex maniac stunner from God and we can negotiate.
I will ALSO be looking for MALE talent to fuck some of these girls, if you'd be interested, again, send me a P/M.
NOTE: All intercourse scenes will be w/condom.
Tchau
By Hemp on Tuesday, February 22, 2005 - 10:21 am: Edit |
Kman I think you and me need to hit some Termas and do some intense and I mean INTENSE interviewing. - Hemp
By Kmanrox420 on Tuesday, February 22, 2005 - 10:39 am: Edit |
i concur wholeheartedly hemp, let's do this!