By Divineaut on Tuesday, October 04, 2005 - 07:06 pm: Edit |
I have discovered through observation and logic that there is a conscious campaign to shape the thoughts and attitudes of men on the "Phat Ass". Through advertising propaganda we are being led to believe that a woman with an ass like say, Jennifer Lopez, Beyonce, the white girl from the old sitcom 'Blossom' is ugly, out of shape, even nasty. We see this in movies, commercials, magazines. All these influences are in basic accord with each other and lead spontaneously in the same direction, one hesitates, however, to call this propaganda. Such influences, which mold behavior, aren't a far cry from cultural prejudices. And yet with deeper and objective analysis, what does one find? That in fact these woman are very attractive and not "fat" at all. I encourage all my Hombre brothers to add a big booty girl on their next conquest. YOU WILL REALIZE THAT YOU HAVE BEEN LIED TO!
By Thumper on Tuesday, October 04, 2005 - 08:08 pm: Edit |
Divineaut, you have to understand where this mindset comes from. The American epitome of beauty for the most part, are supermodels. Now think about this for a moment. Who determines who the newest and greatest supermodels are? Primarily, gay fashion designers and gay fashion editors!
It makes perfect sense that gay men find women who have shapes like men, attractive (ie, Stick figures with no ass or hips). Gay men are not going to think that women with voluptous bodies are beautifull!
Unfortunately, the media buys into their sense of style and opinions. Which is why you have so many guys who will look at a women who is shapely and consider her fat.
By Larrydavid on Tuesday, October 04, 2005 - 09:02 pm: Edit |
the phat asses are great as long as they dont get out of control
By Elgrancombo on Tuesday, October 04, 2005 - 11:14 pm: Edit |
Great point Thumper - I never thought of it from that viewpoint. Divineaut: I don't think anyone's "lying" to us. It seems to me that JLo and Beyonce are propagandized as being the standard of beauty. Anyway who cares if someone tells you that a certain type is beautiful? If they told you chicks with dicks were hot, were you go for that type?
By Divineaut on Tuesday, October 04, 2005 - 11:46 pm: Edit |
Since when has Beyonce been the standard of beauty? Which social outlet is driving that message home? No one is directly telling me what being hot is, you might have missed the point. Read it again.
By Branquinho on Wednesday, October 05, 2005 - 06:19 am: Edit |
I've read it a dozen times and still don't get the point.
C-
;-)
By Catocony on Wednesday, October 05, 2005 - 06:19 am: Edit |
Div,
What is your point exactly? That you don't like large bundas and prefer girls with smaller asses? You prefer skinny girls over thicker girls? Ok, that's fine, plenty of options for all tastes.
As far as Beyonce goes, she's hot - from the tits up. As I have stated before, for a girl as young as her she has really fat thighs and a big ass. As long as she keeps the exercise going, she should be ok, but after she turns 30 and slows down a bit, all bets are off.
Remember after the NBA all-star game a few years back where she did the halftime concert and wore shorts and not the usual long skirt/dress outfits? Every guy was talking the next day about how fucking huge her thighs were, pretty nasty all around. She was 19 or so at that point, maybe 20?
By Larrydavid on Wednesday, October 05, 2005 - 01:13 pm: Edit |
beyonce and jlo are overrated
By Ee2002 on Wednesday, October 05, 2005 - 03:19 pm: Edit |
Although I think they(Beyounce and JLO) are overrated too, their asses are awesome.I wish there were more asses like theirs out there,lol.Thats why Brazil is so great...
By Divineaut on Wednesday, October 05, 2005 - 04:06 pm: Edit |
That's the spirit! Or how about Iris Chacon, the Puerto Rican Vendette of the 70's and 80's her ass was awesome and she had the same waist and stomach as some of those scared to eat cover girls. To the misinformed try this, get a big booty girl, lay her on her stomach, then get in from there and pounce away. Then try it with a no booty, but very pretty skinny girl,(sarcasm added) and post your results.
By SF_Hombre on Wednesday, October 05, 2005 - 06:13 pm: Edit |
I've done both. The advantage is you can put the "very pretty skinny girl" on top and when she bangs you with speed it's wonderful. When a fat assed whore bangs you from on top you feel you are on the wrong end of a piledriver loaded with two 80 pound bags of cement
Of course, a girl with a fat ass does have all that unused expanse of flesh which gives you someplace to put your glass of beer while you try to find the right wrinkle from behind. I usually put my Skol right next to the Hormel Thanksgiving Ham label on her right cheek (hehe).
By Elgrancombo on Thursday, October 06, 2005 - 12:31 am: Edit |
Personally, I like the big-Bunda types, bit it sounds like we might all agree on this: A girl with a nice thick Bunda is great for Doggy Style and a thinner more "spinner" type is great for when she's on top.
By SF_Hombre on Thursday, October 06, 2005 - 03:39 am: Edit |
True...as long as -- in both cases -- the bundas are firm: I don't need any more visual lessons in wave propagation.
By Knockkneedman on Thursday, October 06, 2005 - 05:43 am: Edit |
What the hell are all you people doing watching Blossom.