By Xenono on Monday, September 29, 2003 - 03:49 am: Edit |
"Sex Tourism" Big Problem in Nogales, Mexico
By Porker on Monday, September 29, 2003 - 04:28 am: Edit |
Brilliant, hard-hitting journalism. Some lowlife cocksucker street tout tells idiot reporters there are underaged girls in Nogales, then won't produce any because of his 'reputation'. They report his exaggerated claims anyway, as well as the claims of some idiot white women who I am sure have their finger on the pulse of the Nogales sex scene. Said idiot reporters don't find a single underaged girl, but do find alleged prostitutes in bars. And we all know that you dirty whoremongers would never go to places where there was a shortage of underaged girls.
Sounds like Pulitzer material.
By Catocony on Monday, September 29, 2003 - 06:33 am: Edit |
Where is Bush Town? I still think that Nogie sucks from a mongering standpoint but if this place is as cool as the taco vendor says it is, I'll join the other hundreds of Americans there every night.
These reporters should have checked out Mr.Bill's Nogie page to get tips on avoiding street people. Ask a street guy if there are underage girls, Martian pussy, whatever and they'll point you in some direction just to get a tip.
By Roberto on Monday, September 29, 2003 - 12:18 pm: Edit |
It must be sweeps week. This story runs every year.
By Farsider on Monday, September 29, 2003 - 07:30 pm: Edit |
"Martian pussy" LOL...
Actually, I prefer Plutonian women. Besides, everyone knows Mars is a complete dump, with ugly women, and it's full of scams, ripoff artists and hustlers.
And stay away from Venus. All the women there are men.
By Orgngrndr on Monday, September 29, 2003 - 08:16 pm: Edit |
This is another push by those with a political agenda.
Find a pet reporter, feed them "a story" and them get a newspaper to publish it. Then some there will be "rightful indignation" then a"call for action". Unfortunatly they run these stories every year.
The problem is: if you keep repeating it long enough and loud enough people will thinks it really is true.
Don't believe me??
try this
"Saddam Hussein has weapons of Mass destruction!!"
"Saddam Hussein has weapons of Mass destruction!!"
"Saddam Hussein has weapons of Mass destruction!!"
"Saddam Hussein has weapons of Mass destruction!!"
or even
"Arnold Swarzenegger will be a good Governer"
"Arnold Swarzenegger will be a good Governer"
"Arnold Swarzenegger will be a good Governer"
"Arnold Swarzenegger will be a good Governer"
or
"Fox News is fair and balanced"
"Fox News is fair and balanced"
"Fox News is fair and balanced"
"Fox News is fair and balanced"
Congratulations !! You have now become a a qualified republican!!
OG
By Phoenixguy on Monday, September 29, 2003 - 10:42 pm: Edit |
Well, if they were using a hidden camera, I don't suppose they were the news crew with the BIG camera I saw on the street across from Rios Sat night.
By Happyboy on Monday, September 29, 2003 - 10:48 pm: Edit |
actually, the sweeps month for televison starts in nov, (also in feb and may)... Didnt they just have a story like this in may 2003?? Same crap, over and over... I am surprised they didnt talk about fernis, lol... BTW, where is this "bush town??" are they talking about "la conga"???
the underage thing is always blown out of proportion... the pimps will SAY ANYTHING to get a tip... to be on the safe side, stick to the clubs only, (where everyone is 18!! lol) or la conga.. hitting the streets can get you in trouble..
(Message edited by happyboy on September 29, 2003)
By Dick Johnson on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 - 12:25 pm: Edit |
Since Bush talked about sex tourism linking it with underaged girls on the UN address there has been no shortage of articles, TV news linking the two. I don't know about Nogales but the women in Tijuana are all pretty much of legal adult age.
By MrBill on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 - 07:53 pm: Edit |
The real outrage about this was that I was not consulted for this story. I'm outraged - OUTRAGED!!
Anyone who knows anything knows that 95% of these girls are over 18. The ones who aren't have already squirted out a kid or two anyway, so they're not virgins when they land in Nogales or anything.
By book_guy on Thursday, October 02, 2003 - 08:10 pm: Edit |
Who picked 18, anyway? What an odd number -- must have something to do with Thomas Jefferson's dictum, that a nation should carry a debt for no more than 18 years. Or something.
Really, I've known 16-year-olds who were hot enough, and together enough, to be able to be very successful providers, should they have chosen so. And 28-year-olds who still hadn't figured out how to set a damn alarm clock to get to a job interview on time. It's got SO little to do with chronological age!
By Brewmeisterbro on Friday, October 03, 2003 - 02:20 am: Edit |
You been reading books again "book guy"? Seriously, I appreciate an ocassional intelligent entry!
By book_guy on Friday, October 03, 2003 - 04:46 pm: Edit |
Actually, B, in the early stages of our democracy, Thomas Jefferson posited that there be a law to limit the national debt to 19 years (IIRC), because as he saw it, no child should be responsible for the debts of his parents. At the time, debtor's prison (and its abuse of authority) was a big scandalous problem in Britain and the other colonies, and the average generation was 18.5 years. Again, IIRC. The numbers fudge a bit in my mind -- 18? 19.5? -- but the point remains, he wanted to outlaw national debt for any period longer than what he perceived to be a single generation.
Smart man, ol' Red. Right up there with Pascal Paoli.