Given all the posts and gripes about how cold, average looking, and money hungry thai pooying is, I figured that I would write up a brief summary of the approach that I take. I’m not saying it will work magic for u, as the approach needs to fit the personality, but the Thailand I have come to know is chock full of beautiful girls who care little about money and are as fun, exciting, and passionate as any. While part of my experience may be attributed to shit luck and charm (cough cough), I have to believe the selection process is an important part of it.

In order of importance I focus on:


Looks: YUP—this is #1. She needn’t be a 10/model, but physical attraction is key! Personally, 99% of the time I go for spinners that are both on the young (early 20s), fit (very low body fat), yet with some curve to ‘em in the hips and chest.

Personality: internally happy (hard to explain), have some common interest with me, quirky at times, warm/passionate, have not been around the block (e.g., not jaded).

Chemistry: If I made it by the personality factor, there's usually some sparks flying. You can’t force chemistry— u can’t buy it, it’s either there or not.

Sexual screening: this is really a non factor when I'm trying to decide on spending time with a girl. I've found that if I hit most of the above criteria, we have some definite sparks and 99% of the time she will work overtime to make me happy (i.e. she WANTS to please).

So as you see, I start with looks then move onto personality and chemistry. If those are a +, then it's a keeper. I find sexual satisfaction follows not leads those traits. Sometimes I go hours and hours sorting though dozens without making a move, sometimes I decide in minute (e.g., ST Soi3 with those beautiful tits/legs, Som, etc).

Other approaches:
The newbie approach is take what falls in your lap—the most aggressive girl who thrusts themselves at you/gives u a woodie… usually the worst choice.

For the experienced monger, the most common approach is starting with sex screening, then guess at personality (IMHO sex screenings tend to skew insight), and then looks, although a bonus, is more of an after thought. The rationale is that since they are looking for a wild time in the sack, so why not just screen for that quality. I’m sure it works a fair amount of time if one is just looking for a good romp. I look for more than that tho.

The end result is that I usually pick completely different kind of gals.

On this last trip, even I had ambitions of being a bit more aggressive and raw, but I find that:

1) it is much more telling about how a girl will be in bed

and

2) that I am much more attracted to a gal

WHEN

I let them express themselves in their own way and at a pace and place they are comfortable with. Of course this is highly dependent on chemistry…

I don't care much about three holes, sometimes I get a gal that doesn't like to give BJs, etc, etc. However, I always have an enjoyable time with them, almost always have at least a very good fuck, usually have a vg bbbj, and overall things get pretty darn intimate. More times than not she wears me out rather than the other way around. Every now and then I come across a Som... a tornado in the sheets.

It's a win/win philosophy before money enters the equation. Good luck!


(Message edited by donmarco on November 16, 2004)

You and I have the same exact selection process.... the only difference is that I bounce back and forth with what type of look that I want. Sometimes I want sexy and sometimes innocent sweet girls off the farm. Depends how horny I am that night. Every once and while I will go for a trophy fuck but if I even get a hint of attitude or they talk about money too soon....I throw the fish back in the water and keep on fishin'

Contrary to popular belief, a person can go for looks first and then weed out the hotties with attitude until you find the one you want. The only interruption to this process is too much alcohol or being so picky throughout the night that you end up with scraps at the end of the night and just fuck whatever is left over.

Blazers-- I do the same thing. My picks are in a range both looks and personality wise depending on my mood and what original quality caught my attention, but the process is the same (top down model).

I usually keep a few pillow sweethearts on ice for those nights I'm more inclined to sleep more. However, I am often pleasantly shocked when my pillow pick turns out to be a pit bull in the sheets.

We gota meet up one of these trips!

"being so picky throughout the night that you end up with scraps at the end of the night and just fuck whatever is left over."


comment: my first couple trips this was a problem. I soon learned to fill my cell with #s of girls that fit the bill. Each night if I don't find one that meets my needs, I usually have a few dozen hotties to select from that I know will fit the bill. Of course, there's some overhead in terms of time invested maintaining my contacts via txt and chat during the day, but it's well worth it to have quality pooying at my beck and call at any time/day.

At night, I can be as selective as I wish without worrying bout the ticker.

-DM

DM

I'm still amused and somewhat amazed remembering watching you sit in a bar on Soi 6 with a young hottie on your lap grinding away at Mr. Happy while you sat there texting all your stringers assuring them you have thoughts only for them , but are not sure you can see them that night. Gotta keep em all warm and fuzzy feeling in case you hit a dry spell but your list was way too long --seemed like too much work and juggling to me. Your cell phone rang more often than the Pattaya Tourist Bureau's. I guess it works for you though and of course that's all that matters isn't it ?

Yes-- keeping 6-10 actives ones in the queue requires a fair amount of work. I usually txt'ed them when I had time to pass... I can't recall that time on soi6, but more than likely I had no interest in the girl on my lap and she didn't get the hint.

Was is that girl who was sitting on the bike outside? She looked HOT on the sportbike, but too full figured for me upon closer inspection.

My methodology is still evolving and will continue to mature. Next trip I'll reduce my stringer list to 4 (last trip I hit a high of a dozen). Returning back so soon tho will not allow a cycling of talent... I'm going to have to disguise myself this trip.

One downside to my method is that the girls never want to leave.

I used to look for trophies in go-gos but now I really check out how they dance. The more they enjoy dancing the more likely they are to enjoy the sex. If a real hottie is doing the old back and forth 2-step I try convince myself to avoid her. I am not always succesful in this attempt and sometimes find myself disappointed.

Yup dancing is a good sign. I hate the phrase, "looking for trophies" personally, as I'm not looking for any such thing. I'm just looking for a girl that I find compatible in the sack and attractive. If I wouldn't pursue a girl or be attracted to her if I met her in a normal bar in the USA, why the heck would I fly around the world and pay her for it?

DM said: "If I wouldn't pursue a girl or be attracted to her if I met her in a normal bar in the USA, why the heck would I fly around the world and pay her for it?"

I so agree with that statement. It has been my guide to selecting partners for the past 20 years. Before that, I had a lot less "good times"!!

BTW, thanks for the reports. I always enjoy your posts.

90% of the time I pick the girl with the biggest tits on the block. Might not be the most intelligent selection strategy, but usually keeps me occupied in the room!

DM, when you DID get a crappy lay (as everyone will, from time to time), where did your compass short out in the selection process?

Porker-- To be honest I not only did not have a crappy lay the entire SEA trip, but I would go as far to say I had an excellent lay every time!

I'll also admit, I had a run of both good choices and luck. My last so-so session was back when I was in the DR when I picked the two girls that just showed up at my door. The so-so session before that was last dec. while @ a German FKK and I happened to pick a girl who was nice looking and agressive, but no good in the sack.

The theme here is that when I go through the selection process I listed above, then I have nearly 100% (ok perhaps 95%) sucess rates. When I choose in a relatively rapid and spur of the moment decision, I would say my sucess rate falls to around 50%.

I'm patient usually, so I employ my decision making process for around 90-95% of the girls I barfine. Lucky for me.