Yes, you have a right to comment on reports, but posts like yours serve no good purpose for boards like this.

Okay, you think its stupd I jump on a motorcycle while drinking....AND?? (To be honest, the incident in my report took place over several hours.....by the time I took off on my bike it was daylight out, I was more tired, than drunk! However, sometimes, people tend to want to draw their own conclusions...)

Nonetheless, I still don't see what point you are making or why? Am I suppose to change now? Are you educating other members on the safety of drunk driving? Or, you just post this because you have to right to??? Is that the point you are making??

Members read reports for a variety of reasons, entertainment, intel, to check out the photos, info etc, etc.... I have been writing the same type of reports for several years now and members appear to enjoy them for whatever reasons.

My point is, I think we should at least make an attempt to create an environment for others to want to post reports.

There are numerous members that would love to post reports but they don't because they don't want to be attacked with negative comments, therefore, they just pass.

Why would anyone want to make the effort to post and then be attacked?? I hear this from other members all the time.

Those that do take the time to post trip reports, realize its time consuming and takes a lot of effort. Why not show some appreciation for the members who take the time to post, in turn, the whole board benefits!

Nobody is forcing ANYONE to read any report. If they are offended by something in it, don't read it and take a pass on it.

I am a member on several boards and I spend a lot of time in Pattaya, so, I meet a lot of members from this board and others. A lot of members actually witness first hand what I do in Pattaya. You may suspect I am exaggerating, as you never met me, but they are plenty of others who witness my actions.

If you read any of my past trip reports, you will realize I don't hold back....I post negative and positive things. I even posted a trip report in the past about my encounter with a ladyboy! See, I don't mind the comments, or I would have never posted a report like that. The point is.....others do mind and are not posting for these same reasons.

What is the purpose of posting a trip report to be politically correct? If I do something stupid, I'm going to write in my report. Or, do you want others to post reports to just please others.

I, and others, would LOVE to see more reports posted and for others to be encouraged to write anything they please.

What is the purpose of creating a negative environment, whereas, others are not encouraged to write trip reports or speak freely in them??

It's nothing wrong with a little constructive criticism, but a lot of negative comments I see are really just plain petty.

I love it when newbies (kersuet123 - 15 posts; choc - 36 posts) come on the board and feel they have to give moral guidance to other members.

Do you guys not know where you are? A website devoted to WHORE MONGERING. An activity, which we lovingly call a hobby, that is considered IMMORAL by the vast majority of society.

I would humbly suggest you keep your moral preaching to yourself. If you do not enjoy Priew's posts or activities - don't read them. It's as simply as that!

Enjoying the report Priew, keep up the good work.

EA

Choc....You are not even worth a response!

Do you plan on contributing anything to this board, or would you just continue to be a troll?

It's funny how you think I am jerkoff, but given the fact that can point out details in each of my report, it only shows that you CONTINUE to read them. LOSER!

You probably haven't even travelled out of your home state and just jerk off to my reports...LOL!

(Message edited by priew100 on December 04, 2011)

Thx for the support fellows!

I enjoy our hobby and will continue to write reports, as I realize members appreciate them, as I run into them all the time in Pattaya!

Trust me, I don't worry about a few haters on the board.

(Message edited by priew100 on December 04, 2011)

El Apodo writes: "Do you guys not know where you are? A website devoted to WHORE MONGERING. An activity, which we lovingly call a hobby, that is considered IMMORAL by the vast majority of society."

Yes, I have also recently seen this argument put forward on this site to excuse the posting of blatantly racist material. But it is a false argument. Just because others (although perhaps not a vast majority of society) consider partaking with prostitutes immoral does not make it so. Nor does it mean those who see prostitutes are by that fact relieved from otherwise behaving morally. There is simply no logic behind the idea that just because one sees prostitutes, this means one can behave generally like a sociopath, and brag here about it.



(Message edited by laguy on December 04, 2011)

"Trust me, I don't worry about a few haters on the board."

Priew 100: I never would have thought you were a member of the far rightwing, but given that you are using one of their most noteworthy tactics--calling anyone who dares to raise any criticism a hater--I must now wonder. Trying to justify your sociopathic behavior by calling anyone who voices criticism a "hater" is really pathetic.

And don't delude yourself into thinking just because we read some of the installments of your "Adventures in Being a Train Wreck" we therefore are endorsing your behavior. Reading something does not equate to supporting it.

(Message edited by LAguy on December 04, 2011)

>>You think that treating people well in one instance, somehow gives you a pass in acting like a sociopath in another?<<

Exactly.

Cmon...give me a break, with all of this "sociopath" bullshit! Then it must be thousands of sociapaths in Pattaya!!

First of all, I NEVER stated I was too drunk to drink, but somehow you assumed this fact. The fact of the matter is, a lot of facts are being taken of context.

Have you ever partied on Walking Street in Pattaya? Well, it NEVER closes! I was literally out ALL nite bar hopping. It was probably near noon when I ready to go home. We were tired and in NO condition to fuck. I wasn't too drunk to drive a bike. (re-read the report) Yes, I like to live on the edge, but I'm not going to risk my life or others.

As far as trying to get rid of the girls, again, you must understand how "clinging" some of these girls can be in Pattaya. They will NOT take "no" for an answer.

Give me a freakin break with all of this "social conscience" bull....

(Message edited by priew100 on December 04, 2011)

The members on this board have done a little more than just read my trip reports.

They also have taken the time to vote on them as while.

The majority of all my trip reports have been voted the best by the members, with a couple as best for the Year.

Notably, the members have made their voices and opinions known.

Just like El Apodo stated, if you don't like them, don't read them and move on. What is the real issue here?

Player hating is pathetic....

"First of all, I NEVER stated I was too drunk the drink, but somehow you assumed this fact. The fact of the matter is, a lot of facts are being taken of context."

Here are YOUR own words:
"..we are both fucked up and were in no condition to fuck..."
"I start to jump on my bike..."
"we were just flat out drunk.."

Maybe you should provide the board with a blood alcohol count at the time of your next post.
Then again maybe your do-rag was just to tight......

Good one, Copperfieldkid....

I do understand the criticism of this incident, but trust me guys, I'm too young to die....I do have my limits!

If you checked out my earlier trip reports, you would see the R1 1000 I used to drive around Pattaya in. But after seeing so many accidents around town lately, I know just ride around a little moped....LOL!!

LAGuy blathers:

"Yes, I have also recently seen this argument put forward on this site to excuse the posting of blatantly racist material. But it is a false argument. Just because others (although perhaps not a vast majority of society) consider partaking with prostitutes immoral does not make it so. Nor does it mean those who see prostitutes are by that fact relieved from otherwise behaving morally. There is simply no logic behind the idea that just because one sees prostitutes, this means one can behave generally like a sociopath, and brag here about it."


So your saying that someone who plays with a woman's mind and drives drunk is a sociopath? Those were the issues you were objecting to correct? If that is the case, the world is FULL of sociopaths. You either need to learn the definition of sociopath or re-evaluate reality. To use your twisted logic, just because others (although perhaps not a vast majority of society) consider drunk driving immoral does not make it so. See, doesn't really work, does it?

Priew did something you didn't like. That's fine. Instead of ignoring that and enjoying his story for what it is - a fanciful little tale with a bit of braggadocio - you choose to chastise him like a keyboard warrior. When you and a couple of other guys with more than a few posts jump on him you encourage newbies to pile on as well. Whether you want to admit it or not, you are trying to force your moral viewpoint on another. That's shameful behavior in my opinion.

Again, if you don't like his style or actions - move on. Take your morality to the MADD website or a women's abuse website. I'm sure they will set aside all their moral objections to prostitution and welcome you and your mongering ways with open arms.

EA

>>So your saying that someone who plays with a woman's mind and drives drunk is a sociopath?<<

No, that is not exactly what I am suggesting although I can understand why you might think it is. What follows is the section of his report I found objectionable, not only because he did these things but also because he thought it was appropriate to brag about it here (I have added emphasis to the most problemmatic portions):

>>I started to joke with her and tell her that I my friend...”really likes you”. I then asked her if she wanted to go with my friend. She seemed a little confused and somewhat hurt by me asking this. She responded with....“no....I like you”. She further claimed that she could not go with him cuz he was my friend and she did not wanted to cause any problems.

I changed gears and gave her the sad story routine. I told her my friend only stays (1) more day in Pattaya and that I really wanted him to have a good time his last nite. I tried to convince her that I really liked her and if she went with my friend.....she can return the next day and that it will not be problem, cuz he will be gone the next day.

“No....I not like, I think you get mad at me if I do”, she continued to insist.

I started to plead with her that I will not get mad and just wanted to see my friend have a good time. “He so shy”, I claimed and then informed her that I wanted him to have a sexy girl before he left Thailand.

With hesitation, she appeared to agree to it but reiterated that she was going to return the next day. I called my friend immediately and told him we were coming. I had to move on this right away....before she changed her mind. Funny thing......my friend was actually here for another week...LOL!!

We arrive at the hotel and my friend is waiting outside the hotel. She was starting to get cold feet and I knew she felt kind of awkward. The minute she got off the bike.....I started to drive off, as I felt she was going to back down any minute now.

My partner enjoys her for the evening and then calls me the next afternoon. I knew what he wanted and avoid answering the phone. He then sends me a text, “answer your phone, bitch”.

I finally call him back. He jokingly stated.....”this girl will not wake up”. We both laugh. He finally manages to wake her up, however, before she leaves, she asks him to call me, as she didn't have my cell number. She insists to my friend that I wanted her to return but my friend knew she was lying. With this in mind, he calls me himself and then hands her the cell after I answer the phone. She asks me if I wanted her pick up some food before she returned to my condo. “WTF”, I thought.

NOW.....here is the “bait and release” trick. I changed gears on her and I played the 'hurt and jealous' boyfriend. I asked her.....”you boom boom my friend?”. She paused on the phone, as if she was kind of surprised as to what I was saying.

“yes...but I do for you, I like you mak mak”, she states with somewhat of sincerity.

“Wow....I think you not do, I think you just talk with him.....I can not believe you boom boom my friend.....Now, I am hurt mak mak, cuz I liked you too much”, I stated, while trying not to laugh and remain serious.

We go back and forth.....but I continue to play the hurt role and eventually hang up the phone on her, acting as if I was really hurt and angry.

My friend called me back laughing and stated the girl left with a dumbfounded look on her face and he wanted to know what I said to her to get rid of her. We both continued to laugh our asses off......and vowed that we will continue to do that the rest of the trip....especially, since we both had the same taste in women.<<

It also bears mentioning that I said he was behaving like a sociopath; I don't believe I said he was a sociopath. If you are unfamiliar with what behaviors are considered sociopathic, here you go:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociopath





(Message edited by laguy on December 04, 2011)

I actually can appreciate and understand LA Guy's criticism about the drunk driving. But, it's not like I downed a bottle of vodka and immediately jumped on a bike with a girl. I should have left the "drunk" comment out, as this really wasn't the case. For the most part, I control my liquor and not a heavy drinker.

In regards to the other incident, well, I guess we could just "agree to disagree" on that subject...LOL!

I also find his motives in posting these comments rather suspect. I just can't understand what he attempts to accomplish. We are all adults here.....

Furthermore, I just can't see how all of this back and forth about "mongering ethics" helps this board.

My style of writing has been consistent over the years and I do not forsee it changing in the future. You would think the veterans on this board would just pass on reports that deemed objectionable.....unless they have other motives in place.

Nonetheless, given this reality now, maybe members that feel offended by what they read previously in my reports, will now just take a PASS the next time they see one posted.

We made our points and now, maybe, we just can move on.

Due to funds, family issues and business issues I've had to limit my travels to the USA in the last 18 months. I read through all this and have these thoughts.

I don't care who Priew100 does at night and make it my place to never be critical of anyone's pulls. Some of them I think more or less of as I'm sure others would say of my pulls. Those of the mongers on this board that know me well know that there aren't many things that I wouldn't try to do to or with a Thai or AC girl, so again I can't fault another monger's behavior with the girls, short of violence. If they don't like it they don't have to hang with Priew100. I do draw the line at ladyboys, but if that turns on someone else that's their business.

I never saw anything wrong with trading a happy meal from Jollibee for Cherry Ass in AC, sample BJs, the often broken promise of I won't come in your mouth, do my buddy or don't come back, I have an allergy to latex, ATM or many other perversions. So who am I to be critical.

On the other hand during my many months of mongering in Pattaya as well as AC I've driven many motorbikes way to drunk and would think twice about doing it ever again. In the last two years in the USA I've driven different motorcycles and scooters many thousands of miles across almost every state of the USA west of the Mississippi at high and low speeds and have learned the dangers of motorcycle riding. Here, in the USA, I always wear a full face helmet and protective clothing when I ride. I also never drink and drive a motorcycle anymore. I know too many guys that have had skin grafts, permanent awful injuries and or died. In his many TRs Priew100 has made a point out of saying that he's an experienced biker and even made jokes about some of the Sunday riders that rent high powered bikes in Thailand. I've now been riding one of the world's most high powered bikes for many thousands of miles through some of the greatest challenges that the USA has to offer. I've ridden out of Jackson Hole to Idaho at night, starring down a charging Elk, done the Devil's Staircase (Utah) in daylight and night, downshifted at 80 MPH to hit 130 MPH in two seconds passing four cars and a semi, and hang on boards of guys that take their bikes and bike trips as seriously as we take mongering.

We would all take exception to riding after a night of drinking till dawn and then putting a passenger without gear onto the back of our bike for a ride endangering us both. I'm fine on a 10% downgrade around a series of turns at 70 with my pegs scrapping off the ground but only stone cold sober.

I do think it's Priew100's choice to ride drunk or not with or without protective gear, however it's a choice that I wouldn't make again. Even more so from Pattaya to Jontiem and not just a couple of blocks to the Vault.

>>I also find his [LAguy's] motives in posting these comments rather suspect.<<

Okay, I'll bite. What motives are you attributing to me? Let's hear your fantasies on this since you have now brought this subject into the conversation.

Too bad, because if you hadn't been compelled to ratchet things up in this way, we could have all moved on.

I love Mr. Pimp's pathetic attempt to walk-back his mulitple admissions of drunken driving, sounds like some disingenious politician. But just so any poor-memoried CHer's don't fall for this, some quotes from Mr. Pimp, BEFORE we started to criticize him:

"After a lot more drinks, we decide its time to call it a nite. Neither one of us wanted to take a girl, as we were both blasted at this point. We realized....it's six in the morning, we both fucked up....."


"why waste any money on a girl....when neither one of us is in any type of condition to fuck."

"We arrive at the hotel We finally confront the girls and let them know we are both fucked up and were in no condition to fuck."

"I start to jump on my bike and jokingly stated to my friend.......Mind you, guys.....these girls were not bad looking, but we were just flat out drunk, tired and just wanted to return to our respected beds and call it a day."

Re-read that last quote by Mr. Pimp, as he starts to jump on his bike he states..."we were just flat out drunk..."

And now Mr. Pimp wants to clumsily backtrack and claim he really wasn't so drunk after all (additionally please recall, Mr. Pimp did NOT initially dispute his own drunken claim, AT FIRST he defended his actions and said he would not "apologize," it was only many of his posts LATER that he decided to semi-recant--thus he has no credibility). In addition to being an admitted abuser of women, and an admitted drunk driver, we now know, from Mr. Pimp's OWN WORDS that he is a LIAR as well. Case closed.

"I love it when newbies (kersuet123 - 15 posts; choc - 36 posts) come on the board....(sic)" - El_apodo

Whether we agree or disagree let's not discourage any member from posting, especially newer ones.
There are some members here over 10 years with fewer than 30 posts, and for whatever reason a subject will invoke sharing a thought or idea and a 'new' handle appears until research reveals a vet posting. El apodo, if you insist on using a yardstick to post, there's this: they paid their dues!

Here's a current reminder from the poll on this subject why members don't participate or want to get involved.
*** What would it take to get you lurkers to post***
Poll created 05/26/09 by Copperfieldkid
-What would it take to get lurkers to participate & contribute to chats/discussions?

(1) Stop the noob bashing and be more welcoming. [it can be intimidating]
resultgraph 21% (16 votes)
(2) Have the 'Regulars' take a vacation!
resultgraph 5% (4 votes)
(3) I'm afraid to post,because newbies get treated like shit by some of the regulars.
resultgraph 6% (5 votes)
(4) I'm working on feeling more comfortable with my posting status.
resultgraph 4% (3 votes)
(5) All forums have 80-90% lurkers, 10-20% posters. It's the nature of the beast, don't worry about it.
resultgraph 46% (34 votes)
(6) I'm going to start posting so I can get anally raped on a daily basis!
resultgraph 15% (11 votes)
73 total votes?


(Message edited by copperfieldkid on December 05, 2011)

I usually assume that reports are written with some degree of literary license. I generally do not take all points in a report as simple factual statements. Taking this perspective reduces my desire to jump all over a poster's description of events.

And, quite honestly, I have a hard time understanding why so many here enjoy throwing stones, or at least seem anxious to do so.

CFK,

Simply paying you dues does not give a person the right to enforce their moral viewpoint on others. Again, if they don't like it - skip it. Don't continue to bash once you've made your point. It's childish and pathetic.

I agree with Priew - too many haters here. (And I'm FAR from a right-winger - ha, ha)

EA

Drunk driving not a good idea but I have seen guys do a lot worse in Pattaya. His treatment of women seems no worse than 99% of mongers that go to any mongering destination.

Be that as it may, I think the reason why Priew gets harshed on is his approach to his reports. The focus seems to be him instead of the girls or his experiences. Like, "look at me, aren't I the pimp of the year...look how these girls love me." May not realize he comes across this way but that's the way it is. He also takes a big risk from getting bashed because he has photos of himself in his reports.

I always thought the M in MADD was for Mothers, not Mongers. Sheesh. Different issue for a different forum if you ask me.

And I'm FAR from a hater - lol

I would like to keep this thread free of any furthur fecal matter.

CFK

(Message edited by copperfieldkid on December 06, 2011)

>>Simply paying you dues does not give a person the right to enforce their moral viewpoint on others.<<

El Apodo, No one is "enforcing" their moral viewpoint here. They are commenting. There is a big difference.

But the notion that we should pay attention to what you think an appropriate comment on this board is--you being the person who in the thread lamenting that Gabrielle Gifford got shot in the head stated: "perhaps more political shooting WOULD be a good thing. At least we get some new faces,"--is ludicrous. And although you had a problem understanding this point back in that thread, it didn't matter whether you meant it literally or somehow thought in your twisted mind you just were telling a hilarious joke. And that is similarly how I felt about Prview's account of his interaction with the woman that I focused on above (if one goes back to my initial post on this matter--unfortunately 1/2 the posts have been moved helter skelter into this thread thereby making some of them now appear out of context--I indicated I did not think his account was "funny," a comment which is a far cry from "enforcing one's moral viewpoint").

After reading through everything I think preview is being a big baby.
The few negative comments were not done in a disrespectful way at all.

A few people voiced their opinions on what appears to be inappriate behavior by preview and it's preview who's making a big deal of this.

I say grow-up and accept the comments that come your way and that especially holds true when you do something as crazy as you did, driving drunk and risking anothers life.

I've been mongering when you were in diapers son, and I haven't yet found any need to play silly, possible hurtful games with girls, maybe it's because of such foolish games that your friends got taken by other girls.

Then he feels the need to start a new thread devoted to the few negative comments.

Then preview has to remind everyone that his trip reports won so many awards, what arrogance there, as though because he's won awards how dare anyone question him, again a very childess, arragant, big baby type attitude.

Is it possible, because you won awards your pants are getting a bit to big for you.......................

Man, everyone's against drunk driving too???? Then I must really be a pariah around here now.

LAGuy continues to whine:

"But the notion that we should pay attention to what you think an appropriate comment on this board is--you being the person who in the thread lamenting that Gabrielle Gifford got shot in the head stated: "perhaps more political shooting WOULD be a good thing. At least we get some new faces,"--is ludicrous. And although you had a problem understanding this point back in that thread, it didn't matter whether you meant it literally or somehow thought in your twisted mind you just were telling a hilarious joke."

Ok, sue me for having a shitty sense of humor. At least I'm man enough to admit when I'm wrong unlike you who displays a pompous attitude and CONTINUES to try and defend an absolutely idiotic position. Good luck with that little man....

Congratulations, you've become Captain-Save-A-Monger. Best of luck at your self-appointed job as CH Morality Enforcer.

EA

>>LAGuy blathers:<<

>>LAGuy continues to whine:<<

How infantile El Apodo. It would appear that your mommy never taught you manners.

You state I am continuing to defend an absolutely idiotic position. And what position is that??

Perhaps you are referring to my last post where I noted that contrary to your false claim that people were trying to "enforce their moral viewpoint here" they were only commenting, not enforcing.

Or maybe you consider it idiotic that in my second to last post here I asked Prview for the first and only time to explain his statement that he finds my motives here "suspect." Gee, repetitive and stupid me for asking the question (never responded to) one time.

Or perhaps you consider it idiotic that when YOU asked me: "So your saying that someone who plays with a woman's mind and drives drunk is a sociopath?," I answered you.

You might want to take a course in reading comprehension. If you understood plain English you wouldn't make false claims about what is in my posts. Then again you probably would anyway, for whatever reason I would hate to speculate about.

LAGuy whimpers:

How infantile El Apodo. It would appear that your mommy never taught you manners

Ha ha, pot calling the kettle black. Good luck there Captain S-A-M.

EA

EA lamenting that Gabrielle Gifford got shot in the head stated: "perhaps more political shooting WOULD be a good thing. At least we get some new faces,"

Gabrielle "Gabby" Giffords & Mark Kelly live 5 miles from me, perhaps I should print a copy of EA's post and have them read it so as to personally witness their POV and get back to the board with the results. I was at the dog park last week talking with Chris Ferguson [commander of the last shuttle flight], and he had just visited them recently. Too bad I didn't run it by him for yet another opinion.

The point; what may be fodder for someone is serious to others that have been affected negatively or tragically by the subject matter. How anyone can mock MADD or support drunk driving is beyond logic and reason.

"I do understand the criticism of this incident..." - Priew

Even the author of the post has owned up to his actions and subsequent response posts.

CFK,

Had LAGuy been honest in his post, he would have also included this quotation from a later portion of that thread.

"While my off-the-cuff response may have indicated to those who cannot read past the obvious words on the page, that I wish politicians would be shot, it is far from the case."

But of course, that doesn't serve his purpose.

I admit, it was a joke in bad taste made at a poor time. If you feel the need to share my post with these people, feel free. Just make sure to share that you got my opinion from a website devoted to discussing prostitution in foreign countries in which you are an active member. In other words, make sure to display your hypocrisy in the most honest fashion. If you do that, you will have my respect. And, I'm sure that my opinion will mean the same to them that LAGuy's does to me - absolutely nothing.

I take full responsibility for my insensitivity and I am in no way asking other people to "account for their behavior" when it does not affect me in the slightest. How many other people in this thread can say that?

EA

(Message edited by el_apodo on December 07, 2011)

First off asshole, it was not dishonest for me to reproduce what you said on January 12 without also reproducing your later posted and also-offensive (given what had just happened) January 13 post.

Here is the full UNEDITED EA January 13 post (which EA wrote in response to me calling him out on his sick January 12 post):

"LAGuy writes, "What an idiot. Particularly to post that (lame joke or not) in light of recent events."

"I assume you're speaking to me. Sorry if I offended your delicate sensibilities, but please explain one thing. How is this event, tragic as it is, any more tragic than the hundreds of other shootings across the country every day? Simply because it happened to a politician? I don't buy it.

"While I feel sorry for all involved, I can't help but feel that those people in politics, both on the left and right, who refuse to follow the greatest principal that the country was founded upon - compromise - are to blame for incidents like this. I firmly believe that the only solution to the current political ills in the US is term limits. While my off-the-cuff response may have indicated to those who cannot read past the obvious words on the page, that I wish politicians would be shot, it is far from the case. I do believe that we need an entire generation of new political faces to guide the country out of the failed partisan politics that so many writers in this thread show.

"In the future, in order to continue to isolate yourself from mainstream middle-of-the-road thoughts, you may want to ignore my posts.

EA"

Nice try asshole. And good luck finding people who agree that your "joke" made immediately after Gabby Giffords was shot in the head about how more politicians should be shot represents "mainstream middle-of-the-road thoughts."


(Message edited by laguy on December 07, 2011)

EA,
you're essentially saying those who belong to a monger website have forfeited their morality, and therefore those of us who demonstrate any are hypocrites. Before I do any real damage to your sense of self worth I think it's best to end this discussion. Should you feel the need to call me anything else beside a hypocrite and hater please simply PM me, thus saving all the others from this literary agony.

Sincerely, CFK

This is all so boring....

Yes, I believe that this discussion has run it's course as well. It did serve my primary purpose however, the cry-babies ended their attacks on Priew.

EA

btw, LAGuy, I would only give you a "C" for your effort. You failed to make full disclosure of all posts. I do want to thank you for showing all board members your true self. And, yes, I am an asshole. I trust that you weren't trying to offend me by using that word. If you were, you failed.

(Message edited by el_apodo on December 08, 2011)

>>LAGuy, I would only give you a "C" for your effort.<<

As if I care what a moron thinks.

So, what's the over/under on a katoey shout-out at some point in Priew's latest report?

I always wear a condom when I'm driving drunk, so I should be OK, right???

OK so I jumped to the end of this thread without reading it all.

Priew no offense here but my honest view is that you seem jaded. I think Pattaya is ultimatley a downward spiral that would suck most of us down especially if we spent as much time there as you do.

I'm not judging but if it were me I'd think about giving Pattaya a break. In a way I already have. It's pricier than it ever used to be, the exchange rate sucks and the teeraks have turned to cunts in many cases or just disappointments. When you start trying to match them at their bullshit it might be time to step back and examine things. Just a thought, no judgments.

I'm not sure if you were drunk or not on that bike, but I'd just say be careful and stay with us for a while.

IAS,

I've seen you driving drunk, and it doesn't help that you stretch the condom over your head.

IAS,

Yes, condom is mandatory when driving drunk. They should be left at the door when tying up your Filipina of the moment though.

EA

Hey if "hot shemales" (oxymoron) is your thang, then more power to you. Knock yourself out. To each his own. Just make sure you wipe your mouth and gargle before you leave the room. Try to make an effort to do some pitching as well, mix things up a little. At least that's how I would go about it if I ever switch hit.