It's getting harder by the day to find a good argument for Bush's presidency not being the worst ever:

Here a good start: these floats were part of the annual Carnival Parade in Germany watched by an estimated three million people in three German cities including Düsseldorf.

Doesn't it make you proud that the whole world is laughing at our Country?

If the voters knew just a nickel's worth of Economics it wouldn't be that way.

For that matter, if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle. Happy Friday the 13th.

Did someone walk on your lawn today?

Interesting pics. I thought it was France that had the most anti-American sentiment, maybe I was wrong, lol.

No doubt Obama's had a very rough year, his political naivete is costing him; even the liberal crowd is burned out on him.

Still, the whole Syria thing has me shaking my head at the irony of it all. The NYC area where I live is always anti-war, but I find it funny that other regions of the country that were once gung-ho rah-rah USA about going to Iraq and getting Saddam are suddenly all shy and tentative with regards to Syria and Assad. We ostensibly went to Iraq because we thought Saddam had WMDs and would use them on us or our allies.

At least with Assad, there's no doubt now he has chemical WMDs and is perfectly willing to use them. But even with the certain proof (which Dubya lacked), the WMD theme doesn't work 10 years later, not even for a limited attack.

It's either a ridiculous double standard that Obama's been burdened with -- or a legacy from, yes that's right, the worst POTUS ever, lol!

Show me the proof? Here's what the rest of the world is saying. http://www.smh.com.au/world/un-team-finds-no-proof-on-chemical-weapons-20130911-2tkv1.html

(Message edited by bluelight on September 15, 2013)

Wow, a tabloid in Australia is your source as "what the rest of the world" is saying? Fuck, has the National Enquirer weighed in on this yet? Mad Magazine?

@Cat: LOL

@Bluelight: Search Youtube for "syria gas attack video." They can't all be b.s.'ing.

Slightly back toward the spirit of this site: Check out the female "bodyguard." He must have loved getting his hands on those big brown LEGS! MMmmm...

I couldn't find one video that showed Assad's troops using gas. Not a one. Where is yours? You know I did find this article with quotes from Doctors without Borders in a US newspaper. But I'm sure that's a rag just like Sydney Morning Herald which has been around since 1831 with a readership of over 700k. Ya, just another rag. Oh yea, them Doctors without Borders they are just of bunch of losers also right? I'm fucking tired of all these blind losers who can't think for themselves. Why would Assad use gas when he is winning? He wouldn't. Just keep drinking your kool-aide and stay away from me! http://www.mintpressnews.com/witnesses-of-gas-attack-say-saudis-supplied-rebels-with-chemical-weapons/168135/

(Message edited by bluelight on September 15, 2013)

Guy, you nearly got kidnapped by a hooker WHO REFUSED TO SLEEP WITH YOU.

Now, who's the blind loser in this discussion?

Now, as to your latest reliable source:

Mint Press News (MPN) is a US news website established in January 2012, based in Minnesota. Founded by Mnar A. Muhawesh, a Minnesota-born daughter of Palestinian immigrants, and journalism graduate of St. Cloud State University, it aims to bring foreign news to a US audience, with a particular focus on the Middle East. In September 2013 it listed ten reporters on its website.

In September 2013 MPN's reporting, allegedly based on interviews with rebels in Damascus, that the Al-Nusra Front was responsible for the 2013 Ghouta attacks attracted marginal attention and was picked up by Voice of Russia and Press TV.

The editor has investors, “retired businesspeople”, but she will not name them — "unfortunate for a journalism operation fighting alongside people seeking transparency. The site's "About Us" page is similarly skinny." Her father-in-law Odeh A. Muhawesh — an adjunct St. Thomas theology professor, and veteran Twin Cities businessman — is a key adviser. The Odeh Muhawesh Fan page on Facebook starts at the top with a link to Iran Press TV and carries much anti Syrian rebel material. Mint Press News has been characterized as a 'Shia advocacy site' on PJ Media

So this is how one fills one's time when stranded in GringaLand?

Counting my blessings I can still travel the world and fuck the pretty women

One of the many joys of going out of Country is (intentionally) being blissfully unaware of all the shit going on in the States. During any trip it's wonderful not to hear/read the same things going on that never change; 'same shit, different day'...

(Message edited by copperfieldkid on September 16, 2013)

Is the WSJ credible enough for you?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323981304579078661513059576.html

For me? Yes, the WSJ is credible, and they agree with every other credible source that the Syrian government used chemical weapons. I and most other intelligent humans have known this for weeks. It's the tin-foil hat brigade and the Obama haters that bring up reports that contradict this information. Such as the vaunted Sydney newspaper and the pro-Iranian propaganda piece put out by the crazy Palestinian family in Minnesota.

Lets say Assad used large bombs to pulverize the neighborhood or napalm like weapons to burn it down instead of chemical weapons. Would it have made much of a difference? Would Obama have agreed that its more moral to pulverize a neighborhood with large bombs then use chemical weapons?

These tactics that Assad is using is no different then what the United States did to cities in Germany and Japan. The United States firebombed entire cities. They nuked Japan. So whats the difference?