Based on her posts on this board so far, I've noticed...

Posted by RickFeliz on March 21, 2001 at 11:26:32:

In Reply to: Re: Update and more questions! posted by epa on March 21, 2001 at 11:18:31:

that TJResearcher does not seem to understand or is not interested in "mejor para ambos".
One man's opinion.

"mejor para ambos" TJResearcher 11:50:59 03/21/01 (10)

Re: "mejor para ambos" enlightenment kendricks 15:01:47 03/21/01 (8)

whats in it for you TJResearcher 21:40:05 03/21/01 (4)

What's missing. RickFeliz 23:40:50 03/21/01 (1)

Re: What's missing. gaucho 15:11:57 03/23/01 (0)

Re: whats in it for you tight_fit 22:50:14 03/21/01 (1)

links? TJResearcher 08:24:38 03/22/01 (0)

Re: "mejor para ambos" enlightenment rookie 18:26:17 03/21/01 (2)

Re: "mejor para ambos" enlightenment kendricks 19:53:23 03/21/01 (1)

Agree...Agree...Agree....(NCF) Swadi 20:30:33 03/21/01 (0)

Re: "mejor para ambos" gaucho 13:21:38 03/21/01 (0)